Enoxaparin Sodium Biosimilar in the Prophylactic Treatment of Veinous Thromboembolism and Thromboembolic Disease: Prophyvar Study

Objectives: Varenox is the first locally manufactured and approved biosimilar in Algeria. It is an enoxaparin sodium (ES) with established good analytical characterization and manufacturing quality control. The aim of the PROPHYVAR study was to generate real-life data in routine practices and to assess the safety and tolerability in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Method(s): This is an observational, prospective, multicenter study, conducted between April 2021 and May 2022. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) related to the study drug. A sample size of 500 patients was calculated to estimate the proportion of patients with AEs. Assuming that approximately 10% will be lost to follow-up or not evaluable, 550 patients were needed to describe the impact of Varenox use. Result(s): The study was conducted in 25 different sites in Algeria, in 4 therapeutic areas: ICU, orthopedic surgery, obstetrics and nephrology;550 patients were included and received at least one injection of Varenox. The mean age was 47 years, women in majority (62.5%). The patients were overweight or obese (53%), with a history of arterial hypertension (25%), diabetes (7.5%) and renal failure (6.4%). Reasons for hospitalization were mainly fracture (15.5%), pregnancy (8.3%), COVID-19 (7%) or cancer (7%). The majority of patients were treated at prophylactic dose of 0.4ml (80%) or 0.6ml (10%). The median duration of follow-up was 24 days. A total of 38 patients experienced at least one AE (6.9%, CI95=[4.9%;9.4%]). Related AEs were reported in 10 patients (1.8%), mainly in nephrology (N=7 arterio-venous fistula). VTE events were reported in 6 patients (1.1%, CI95=[0.2%;2%]). Conclusion(s): This study suggests that Varenox is safe in the prophylaxis of VTE. To our knowledge this is the first large study describing the use of ES in current medical practice in Algeria.Copyright © 2023

Efficiency estimation on the use of elective surgical theaters in the Chilean public health system from 2018 to 2021

OBjECTivE The efficient use of wards intended for elective surgeries is essential to resolve cases on the surgical waiting list. This study aims to estimate the efficiency of ward use in the Chilean public health system between 2018 and 2021.METHoDS The design was an ecological study. Section A.21 of the database constructed by the monthly statistical summaries that each public health network facility reported to the Ministry of Health between 2018 and 2021 was analyzed. Data from subsections A, E, and F were extracted: ward staffing, total elective surgeries by specialty, number, and causes of cancelation of elective sur-geries. Then, the surgical performance during working hours and the percentage of hourly oc-cupancy for a working day was estimated. Additionally, an analysis was made by region with data from 2021.RESulTS The percentage of elective wards relative to staffed wards ranged from 81.1% to 94.1%, while those enabled in relation to staffed wards ranged from 70.5% to 90.4% during 2018 and 2021. The total number of surgeries was highest in 2019 (n = 416 339), but for 2018, 2020, and 2021 it ranged from 259 000 to 297 000. Cancelations ranged between 10.8% (2019) and 6.9% (2021), with the leading cause being patient-related. When analyzing the number of cases canceled monthly by facility, we saw that the leading cause was trade union-related. The maximum throughput of a ward intended for elective surgery was reached in 2019 with 2.5 surgeries;in 2018, 2020, and 2021, the throughput was around two surgeries per enabled ward for elective surgery. The percentage of ward time occupied during working hours as compared to a contract day ranged from 80.7% (2018) and 56.8% (2020). CoNCluSioNS All the parameters found and estimated in this study show an inefficient utilization of operating rooms in Chilean public healthcare facilities.

2022 CAS Virtual Annual Meeting

The proceedings contain 63 papers. The topics discussed include: a retrospective study to optimize post-anesthetic recovery time after ambulatory lower limb orthopedic procedures at a tertiary care hospital in Canada;a virtual airway evaluation as good as the real thing?;airway management during in hospital cardiac arrest by a consultant led airway management team during the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective and retrospective quality assurance project;prevention of cautery induced airway fire using saline filled endotracheal tube cuffs: a study in a trachea airway fire model;smart phone assisted retrograde illumination versus conventional laryngoscope illumination for orotracheal intubation: a prospective comparative trial;time to single lung isolation in massive pulmonary hemorrhage simulation using a novel bronchial blocker and traditional techniques;cannabinoid type 2 receptor activation ameliorates acute lung injury induced systemic inflammation;bleeding in patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation and fibrinogen level: a cohort study;endovascular Vena Cavae occlusion in right anterior mini-thoracoscopic approach for tricuspid valve in patients with previous cardiac surgery;and mesenchymal stem cell extracellular vesicles as a novel, regenerative nanotherapeutic for myocardial infarction: a preclinical systematic review.

Covid-19 Impacts on Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery

Purpose of Study The COVID-19 pandemic required rapid, global healthcare shifts to prioritize urgent or pandemic-related care and minimize transmission. Little is known about impacts on pediatric orthopedic surgeons during this time. We aimed to investigate COVID-19 related changes in practice, training, and research among pediatric orthopedic surgeons globally. Methods Used An online, cross-sectional survey was administered to orthopedic surgeons with interest in pediatrics in April 2020. The survey captured demographics and selfreported experiences during the pandemic. Surgeons were recruited through web media and email lists of orthopaedic societies over 2 months. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze results. Summary of Results We received 460 responses from 45 countries. 358 (78.5%) respondents reported lockdown measures in their region at time of survey. Most (n=337, 94.4%) reported pausing all elective procedures. Surgeons reported reduction in average number of surgeries per week, from 6.89 (SD=4.61) pre-pandemic to 1.25 (SD=2.26) at time of survey (mean difference= 5.64;95% CI=5.19, 6.10). Average number of elective outpatient appointments per week decreased from 67.89 (SD=45.78) pre-pandemic to 11.79 (SD=15.83) at time of survey (mean difference=56.10, 95% CI: 5.61, 60.58). 177 (39.4%) surgeons reported using virtual modes of outpatient appointments for the first time. Of 290 surgeons with trainees, 223 (84.5%) reported systems to continue training. Of 192 surgeons with research, 149 (82.8%) reported continuing research activities during pandemic. Most reported cessation (n=75, 64.1%) or reduction (n=40, 34.1%) in patient recruitment at time of survey. Conclusions We found significant impacts on pediatric orthopaedic practice with uptake of technology to provide care continuity. Understanding global impacts can inform sustainable practices to provide continuity in future disruptions. We will pursue follow-up surveys to assess longitudinal impacts on surgeons. Epidemiological studies are needed to assess impacts of delayed and virtual care on patient outcomes.

Clinical profile of hospitalized spanish patients allergic to antibiotics

Background: Only between 1% and 10% of patients labelled of penicillin allergy are allergic. The negative events associated with this condition include risk of antimicrobial treatment failure, antimicrobial resistance, side-effects from use of a broader spectrum antibiotic, and increased healthcare costs. Our objective was to know the clinical profile of hospitalized allergic patients to estimate the future need for an allergy study. Method(s): We collected data from 15 Spanish hospitals about hospitalized patients labelled as allergic to antibiotics in February 2020 and October 2020 (one-month sample) outside the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Result(s): 620 patients were collected, 59% women. Mean age 70.6 years (3-103). 416 patients were labelled as allergic to beta-lactams (105 aminopenicillins, 18 cephalosporins, 4 carbapenems). 41 to aminoglycosides, 26 to macrolides, 55 to quinolones and 4 to glycopeptides. The causes of hospitalization were: Respiratory infection 221 (35.6%), abdominal infection 95 (15.3%), orthopaedic surgery 58 (9.4%), urine infections 57 (9.2%), skin infections 51 (8.2%), gynaecological/ obstetric pathology 21 (3.4%) Only 163 patients (26%) had previously received a clinical allergy work-up. 70 confirmed allergy to antibiotics, however the rest 93 (74%) were not delabelled. Patients received alone or combined alternative antibiotics: 79 glycopeptides, 49 aminoglycosides, 28 macrolides, 254 quinolones, 205 beta-lactams (102 cephalosporins, 41 carbapenems and 57 aminopenicillins). 74 patients (12%) would need an immediate allergic study in order to receive first-line antibiotic, but it was only really done in 38 (6.1%). The studied antibiotics were: 15 carbapenems, 10 ceftriaxone, and others not specified. Of the 416 patients labeled as allergic to beta-lactams, 150 (36%) received beta-lactam antibiotics despite the warning in their clinical reports. Conclusion(s): Allergy to beta-lactams remains the most frequent diagnosis of allergy to antibiotics and implies treatment with second-line antibiotics. Respiratory, trauma, digestive and urinary infections are the main causes of the use of antibiotics in hospitalized patients. The underlying diseases could be a risk factor for antibiotic requirements. Some patients received beta-Lactams despite the alert with a potential risk of an allergic reaction and legal implications. The promptly allergological study would imply an improvement in the use of more specific antibiotics with a good level of security.

How Has COVID-19 Affected Orthopedic Surgeons and Residents in Chile? TT -?Como ha afectado el COVID-19 a traumatologos y residentes de traumatologia en Chile?.

Background Since March 2020, Chile has been affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has caused disruptions throughout the world, greatly impacting health services and healthcare workers. Objective To describe the demographic characteristics related to the COVID-19 pandemic in orthopedic surgeons and orthopedic surgery residents in Chile. Methods We conducted an on-line survey requesting data on demographics, work, exposure to and infection by COVID-19, symptoms, and protection practices. Results A total of 567 surgeons answered the survey;37 (6.4%) had had COVID-19, without gender differences. Therewas a higher rate of infectionamong residents, 9 from73 (12.3%), than among surgeons, 28 from 494 (5.7%), as well as higher rates of infection among those working more than 60 hours (p<0.05). Among those infected, 31 (83.8%) were from the Metropolitan Region (MR), where the rate of infection was significantly higher compared with other regions (p< 0.05). Only 8 (21.6%) of those infected had medical history. Hospitalization was required by 3 (5.4%), 1 of them in the Intensive care Unit (ICU), and the remaining were handled at home. The most frequent location of infection was the workplace, with the common areas being the main suspected sites, followed by outpatient clinics and orthopedic surgery wards. In total, 40.5% (15) of the sample reported having infected other individuals. There was also an impact in the surgeon s income: 14.8% (84) reported a decrease lower than 20%, and 45% (256), a decrease higher than 50%. This decrease was higher among surgeons than among residents, and higher among those from the MR compared to other regions (p< 0.05). Conclusion Even though orthopedic surgery practice has been reduced by the pandemic, orthopedic surgeons have been exposed to the risk of infection by COVID-19. The workplace seems to be the site that poses the greatest risk, especially the common areas.Copyright © 2022 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.

Optimal approach to T-cell ALL

T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is curable for most children and adolescent and young adult patients with contemporary frontline chemotherapy regimens. During the past decade, improved survival rates have resulted from the optimization of frontline chemotherapy regimens, the use of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment for evaluating a patient's risk for relapse, and the intensification of treatment based on the persistence of MRD. Optimization of initial therapy is critical because relapsed T-ALL after initial intensive chemotherapy is incurable for most adult patients. Current T-ALL salvage chemotherapy regimens are minimally effective, and unlike in B-cell ALL, there are no approved antibody therapies or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for relapsed disease. Immunotherapy and small-molecule inhibitors are beginning to be tested in relapsed T-ALL and have the potential to advance the treatment. Until effective salvage strategies are discovered, however, intensive frontline therapy is required for cure. In this article I review the current frontline chemotherapy regimens for adult patients with T-ALL, summarize the novel targeted and immune therapeutics currently in early-phase clinical trials, and outline how these therapies are helping to define an optimal approach for T-ALL.Copyright © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.

Hospital Courses Differ Amongst Hip Fracture Patients With or Without Coronavirus-19 Positive Status Upon Admission.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the hospital course and disposition of COVID-19 positive versus negative patients following an operatively managed hip fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients presenting to a university medical center with a hip fracture who underwent surgical management between February 1, 2020 and April 1, 2021. COVID-19 diagnosis was obtained using PCR testing. Hospital length of stay, disposition, readmission, and mortality were compared between patients with and without COVID-19. RESULTS: 399 total patients were identified who met inclusion criteria, with 14 patients who were COVID-positive (3.1%). There was a 6.1 day increase in length of hospital stay for COVID-19 positive patients compared to those who were COVID negative (p = 0.002), without significant changes in disposition, readmission rates, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A positive COVID-19 test at the time of admission can significantly increase hospital admission duration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Virtual Fracture Care in Long-Term Care Homes Avoiding Emergency Department Visits.

Long-term care residents with suspected fractures as a result of a fall typically transfer to the emergency department (ED) for diagnostic imaging and care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, transfer to the hospital increased the risk of COVID-19 exposure and resulted in extended isolation days for the resident. A fracture care pathway was developed and implemented to provide rapid diagnostic imaging results and stabilization in the care home, reducing transportation and exposure risk to COVID-19. Eligible residents with a stable fracture would receive a referral to a designated fracture clinic for consultation; fracture care is provided in the care home by long-term care staff. Evaluation of the pathway was completed and demonstrated that 100% of residents did not transfer to the ED and 47% of the residents did not transfer to a fracture clinic for additional care.

Coaching for the Orthopedic Surgery Leader.

From the increase in telehealth to the expansion of private investors to the growth of transparency (both price and patient outcomes) and value-based care initiatives, health-care delivery is rapidly changing. At the same time, demand for musculoskeletal care continues to rapidly increase, with more than 1.7 billion people globally suffering from musculoskeletal conditions, yet burnout is a major concern and growing since the onset COVID-19 global pandemic. When taken together, these factors have a major impact on the health-care delivery environment and pose enormous challenges and increased stressors on orthopedic surgeons and their teams. Coaching can help.

Correlations Between Department and Training Program Online Presence and Women in Orthopedic Surgery Training.

Background: Orthopedic residency programs increasingly use websites and social media to reach students. This accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially as away rotations became limited. Women remain a minority of orthopedic residents, and there are no data that indicate the correlation between department/program website content or social media presence on the gender diversity of residency classes. Methods: Orthopedic department websites were assessed between June 2021 and January 2022 to identify program director's gender, as well as the gender composition of the faculty and residents. Instagram presence for the department and/or program was also identified. Results: There was no correlation found between the residency program director's gender and the gender diversity of residents in a given program. The percentage of women faculty identified on a department website was significantly correlated with the percentage of women residents in the program, regardless of the program director's gender. While there was an increase in the percentage of women residents among programs with Instagram accounts for the class that started in 2021, this was negated when the percentage of women faculty was taken into account. Conclusion: Efforts on multiple fronts will be needed to increase the number and percentage of women applying for and training in orthopedic surgery. Given the increasing use of digital media, we need a better understanding of what information, including faculty gender diversity, can be conveyed through this format that is useful for women medical students interested in orthopedic surgery to address their concerns about the field.

The impact of confinement on orthopaedic and trauma surgical activity

Introduction: Le 16 mars 2020, devant l'état d'urgence sanitaire décrété en France, le gouvernement a imposé des mesures de confinement dont l'impact sur l'activité de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique reste à démontrer. L'hypothèse de cette étude était que le confinement a diminué l'activité chirurgicale orthopédique et traumatologique. L'objectif principal était d'évaluer l'activité chirurgicale d'orthopédie et de traumatologie en période de confinement et de la comparer à l'activité hors confinement. Matériels & méthodes: Il s'agissait d'une étude rétrospective, monocentrique, observationnelle et comparative d'une cohorte continue de patients inclus pendant la période de confinement du 16 mars au 11 mai 2020. Cette cohorte a été comparée à un groupe de patients inclus de manière rétrospective sur la même période hors confinement l'année précédente du 16 mars au 11 mai 2019. Le critère de jugement principal était le taux d'incidence de l'activité chirurgicale en 2020 versus 2019 sur une période identique. Le critère secondaire était l'analyse des traumatismes recensés. Résultats: Le nombre de patients opérés était significativement diminué en période de confinement: 194 patients inclus en 2020 soit une incidence de 57 pour 100 000 habitants contre 772 patients inclus en 2019 soit une incidence de 227 pour 100 000 habitants;p < 0,001. L'activité chirurgicale d'orthopédie programmée passait d'un taux d'incidence de 147 en 2019 à 5 en 2020 pour 100 000 habitants (p < 0,001). L'activité chirurgicale de traumatologie passait d'un taux d'incidence de 80 en 2019 à 50 en 2020 pour 100 000 habitants (p: NS). Nous retrouvions une augmentation significative des patients de plus de 65 ans pendant le confinement, 70% contre 61% en 2019;p = 0,04. Le taux de fractures du col du fémur était significativement augmenté pendant le confinement, 48,5% contre 39,3% en 2019;p = 0,03. La chirurgie dégénérative était significativement diminuée pendant le confinement (p < 0,001). Discussion: Cette étude montre que l'activité chirurgicale d'orthopédie et de traumatologie a été significativement diminué par le confinement, avec une différence d'incidence de 170 pour 100 000 habitants, confirmant ainsi l'hypothèse des auteurs. Cette diminution est due à la fois à l'arrêt de l'orthopédie programmée et à la diminution de 40% du nombre de patients traumatisés. En période de confinement, le pourcentage de patients âgés de plus de 65 ans victime d'une fracture a significativement augmenté. Conclusion: Le confinement a eu un impact significatif sur l'activité de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique. Niveau de preuve: III;comparative et rétrospective. © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS

[The proximal femur fracture epidemic continued during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of an observational study]. / L'épidémie de fractures de l'extrémité proximale du fémur n'a pas diminuée pendant la pandémie COVID-19: résultats d'une étude observationnelle.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the volume and characteristics of emergency trauma surgery procedures done at our hospital between March 20 and April 20, 2020 (the first month of the national lockdown in France) and to compare these data to the same period in 2019. We hypothesized that a portion of fractures are unavoidable, thus specific preventative measures will be needed to reduce their incidence. METHODS: This was a continuous, observational, single center study. All patients who required urgent surgery for a fracture between March 20 and April 20, 2020, were included. Data for the same period in 2019 was retrieved. All the procedures were done at our hospital, which is a regional level II trauma center. RESULTS: During the first month of the lockdown, 70 patients underwent emergency surgery because of a fracture, versus 109 patients in the same period in 2019, thus an overall 36% drop. The mean age of the patients was higher in 2020 (68.4 years SD = 22) than in 2019 (60.3 years SD = 24, p = 0.0210). There were fewer recreational and motor vehicle accidents in 2020 (34 vs. 10) and fewer work-related accidents (7 vs. 2) although the number of accidents at home were similar (65 vs. 55). CONCLUSION: During a public health emergency, it is vital to continue doing trauma surgery procedures, even though it requires a specific care pathway. The lockdown and associated behavioral changes have altered the spectrum of trauma surgery. A major decrease in motor vehicle, recreation and work-related accidents is the avoidable portion of this surgical activity, justifying specific preventative measures during a public health crisis. Conversely, the incidence of geriatric fractures - particularly of the proximal femur - did not change much overall, thus there is need for additional preventative measures in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, observational study.

Quantifying the Impact of COVID-19 on Hand and Wrist Surgery Procedural Volume: A National Analysis of 381,046 Cases.

Purpose: To quantify and describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on procedural volume trends in hand and wrist surgery from 2020 to early 2022 at multiple centers. Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, a real-time, national, federated research database was used to identify patients of interest from 56 health care organizations across the United States. Patients were queried from March 1, 2018, to February 28, 2022. Current Procedural Terminology codes were chosen using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's hand fellowship procedure requirements. Results: Common hand and wrist surgeries exhibited substantial fluctuations in procedural volume per health care organization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Time periods with considerable procedural volume decreases corresponded with surges in increased COVID-19 caseloads and emergence of COVID-19 variants. Periods of procedural volume increase occurred in the summer of 2020 and immediately following distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine to the public. Fixation of metacarpal fracture, fixation of phalangeal fracture, tendon transfer, flexor tendon repair, and extensor tendon repair consistently showed decreased volumes over the study period. In contrast, ulnar nerve decompression was the only procedure to experience a statistically significant increase in volume over an entire year (2021, +19.2%, P < .001), as compared to before the pandemic. Conclusions: Major milestones of the COVID-19 pandemic correlated with fluctuations in the number of hand and wrist procedures performed across the United States. Future studies should seek to evaluate the impact of patient backlogs and individual procedure fluctuations on financial impacts, patient outcomes, and orthopedic trainee experience. Type of study/level of evidence: Economic/Decision Analysis IV.

The Student You Know: Orthopedic Surgery Home Program Match Rates and Geographic Relationships Before and After COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: In March 2020, COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. This led to the outright cancellation of away rotations and in person residency interviews for the class of 2021. This study aims to identify the geographic relationships in the orthopedic match and further explore COVID-19's effect on these geographic relationships. Furthermore, we aim to compare the home program match rates before and after COVID-19. SETTING: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (tertiary, university-based). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Residency websites and social media sites were used to record basic residency information as well as each resident's year, matriculated medical school, and matriculated medical school geographic data. This information was used to evaluate the proportion of orthopedic residents from "home program" medical schools and evaluate the geographic relationship of matched orthopedic residents. 202 Orthopedic residencies were initially identified and 134 allopathic and nonmilitary residency programs met the inclusion criteria. In all, 3253 of the 3931 (82.7%) current U.S orthopedic residents were included in the analysis. RESULTS: In the 4 orthopedic surgery residency classes before the pandemic (2017-2020), 21.8% of residency slots were filled by home program students. During the pandemic match cycle (2021), this number jumped to 28.2% (p < 0.0006). The increase was observed consistently across residency subgroup analysis: class size, doximity rank, and doximity research rank. Correspondingly, there was a statistically significant increase from 34.7% (2017-2020) to 39.3% (2021) (p = 0.0318) in residencies matching with same state medical students. Regional trends stayed consistent. Our study showed that residency programs matched applicants who went to same region medical schools during the 2020 to 2021 cycle at nearly the exact same rate as they did pre-pandemic (63.6%, up from 63.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that despite widespread virtual away rotations and virtual open houses, residency programs showed an increased preference for their home program students. This trend was significant and widespread, highlighting the generalized nationwide hesitation of both residency programs and students on the virtual interview process.

The proximal femur fracture epidemic continued during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the volume and characteristics of emergency trauma surgery procedures done at our hospital between March 20 and April 20, 2020 (the first month of the national lockdown in France) and to compare these data to the same period in 2019. We hypothesized that a portion of fractures are unavoidable, thus specific preventative measures will be needed to reduce their incidence. METHODS: This was a continuous, observational and single center study. All patients who required urgent surgery for a fracture between March 20 and April 20, 2020, were included. Data for the same period in 2019 was retrieved. All the procedures were done at our hospital, which is a regional level II trauma center. RESULTS: During the first month of the lockdown, 70 patients underwent emergency surgery because of a fracture, versus 109 patients in the same period in 2019, thus an overall 36% drop. The mean age of the patients was higher in 2020 (68.4 years SD=22) than in 2019 (60.3 years SD=24, p=0.0210). There were fewer recreational and motor vehicle accidents in 2020 (34 vs. 10) and fewer work-related accidents (7 vs. 2) although the number of accidents at home were similar (65 vs. 55). CONCLUSION: During a public health emergency, it is vital to continue doing trauma surgery procedures, even though it requires a specific care pathway. The lockdown and associated behavioral changes have altered the spectrum of trauma surgery. A major decrease in motor vehicle, recreation and work-related accidents is the avoidable portion of this surgical activity, justifying specific preventative measures during a public health crisis. Conversely, the incidence of geriatric fractures - particularly of the proximal femur - did not change much overall, thus there is need for additional preventative measures in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, observational study.

Oral paracetamol premedication: a proposal for increasing its use

Peri-operative intravenous paracetamol use has not been shown to be superior to oral administration in a randomised controlled trial looking at postoperative pain [1]. The use of intravenous paracetamol carries a wellrecognised increased financial and environmental cost compared to oral paracetamol. We audited the use of paracetamol in patients attending theatre at a district general hospital and propose a method to increase premedication with oral paracetamol. Methods We retrospectively audited the notes of all patients who underwent an elective surgical procedure in theatres, across a 5-day period at a district general hospital. Data regarding the use of paracetamol were collected. Patients who were already an inpatient and those having surgery under local anaesthetic alone were excluded. Results Forty-seven patients were included, five of whom had a spinal and 42 a general anaesthetic with representation from six different surgical specialities. Five of the patients included were under 18 years. Thirty-seven patients received paracetamol peri-operatively. Thirty-four patients received only intravenous paracetamol, two patients received oral paracetamol and one patient received both due to length of time between preoperative oral dose and surgery. Ten patients did not receive any paracetamol. No patients included had a documented allergy or contraindication to paracetamol. Discussion Our department recognised the financial and environmental benefits associated with oral pre-medication. Although many of these anaesthetists would prefer to prescribe pre-operative analgesia, the data indicate that there are barriers that prevent prescription and/or administration. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, elective orthopaedic surgery with an enhanced recovery protocol including the use of oral paracetamol premedication, was underrepresented in our data. Previous encouragement to prescribe oral premedication has produced good, short-term results but does not appear to provide long-lasting change. We propose a Patient Group Directive for the administration of pre-operative oral paracetamol by the admitting nurse on arrival to the pre-operative ward. We anticipate that this will both standardise and embed oral paracetamol premedication into the department and will therefore provide long-term change.

A systematic review of cost and well-being in hip and knee replacements surgical site infections.

This systematic review examined peer-reviewed literature published from 2010 to 2020 to investigate the health care system costs, hidden out-of-pocket expenses and quality of life impact of surgical site infections (SSIs) and to develop an overall summary of the burden they place on patients. SSI can significantly impact patients' treatment experience and quality of life. Understanding patients' SSI-related burden may assist in developing more effective strategies aimed at lessening the effects of SSI in financial and well-being consequences. Peer-reviewed articles on adult populations (over 18 years old) in orthopaedic elective hip and knee surgeries published from 2010 to 2020 were considered. Only publications in English and studies conducted in high-income countries were eligible for inclusion. A search strategy based on the MESH term and the CINAHL terms classification was developed. Five databases (Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science) were searched for relevant sources. Reviewers categorised and uploaded identified citations to Covidence and EndNoteX9. Reviewers will assess article titles, abstracts and the full text for compliance with the inclusion criteria. Ongoing discussions between reviewers resolved disagreements at each selection process stage. The final scoping review reported the citation inclusion process and presented search results in a PRISMA flow diagram. Four main themes were extracted from a thematic analysis of included studies (N = 30): Hospital costing (n = 21); Societal perspective of health system costing (n = 2); Patients and societal well-being (n = 6) and Epidemiological database and surveillance (n = 22). This systematic review has synthesised a range of themes associated with the overall incidence and impact of SSI that can inform decision making for policymakers. Further analysis is required to understand the burden on SSI patients.

Digital Health Applications to Establish a Remote Diagnosis of Orthopedic Knee Disorders: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Knee pain is highly prevalent worldwide, and this number is expected to rise in the future. The COVID-19 outbreak, in combination with the aging population, rising health care costs, and the need to make health care more accessible worldwide, has led to an increasing demand for digital health care applications to deliver care for patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Digital health and other forms of telemedicine can add value in optimizing health care for patients and health care providers. This might reduce health care costs and make health care more accessible while maintaining a high level of quality. Although expectations are high, there is currently no overview comparing digital health applications with face-to-face contact in clinical trials to establish a primary knee diagnosis in orthopedic surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the currently available digital health and telemedicine applications to establish a primary knee diagnosis in orthopedic surgery in the general population in comparison with imaging or face-to-face contact between patients and physicians. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the PubMed and Embase databases according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) statement. The inclusion criteria were studies reporting methods to determine a primary knee diagnosis in orthopedic surgery using digital health or telemedicine. On April 28 and 29, 2021, searches were conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase. Data charting was conducted using a predefined form and included details on general study information, study population, type of application, comparator, analyses, and key findings. A risk-of-bias analysis was not deemed relevant considering the scoping review design of the study. RESULTS: After screening 5639 articles, 7 (0.12%) were included. In total, 2 categories to determine a primary diagnosis were identified: screening studies (4/7, 57%) and decision support studies (3/7, 43%). There was great heterogeneity in the included studies in algorithms used, disorders, input parameters, and outcome measurements. No more than 25 knee disorders were included in the studies. The included studies showed a relatively high sensitivity (67%-91%). The accuracy of the different studies was generally lower, with a specificity of 27% to 48% for decision support studies and 73% to 96% for screening studies. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review shows that there are a limited number of available applications to establish a remote diagnosis of knee disorders in orthopedic surgery. To date, there is limited evidence that digital health applications can assist patients or orthopedic surgeons in establishing the primary diagnosis of knee disorders. Future research should aim to integrate multiple sources of information and a standardized study design with close collaboration among clinicians, data scientists, data managers, lawyers, and service users to create reliable and secure databases.